News 2022

Testimonial MPharm Appeal upheld - October 2022

 

 Second year Masters of Pharmacy programme (‘MPharm’) student excluded from course due to failure of resit - first appeal was unsuccessful - RT Coopers advised on evidence that needed to be adduced - held audio to elicit background to the case and to particularise the grounds of appeal - drafted appeal on grounds of mitigating circumstances - appeal upheld.

 

Second time around, the MPharm student was repeating the year as previous appeal was upheld after exclusion from the course. The student passed all exams and coursework including end of year written exams and end of year coursework and failed the viva for the Personal Professional Development (‘PPD’) Portfolio and the counselling component of the Fundamentals of Practice.  As the student failed the two components of the PPD Porfolio, the student was asked to repeat the year. There were Exceptional Circumstances which could not have been made known to the Board of Examiners.  RT Coopers drafted the second appeal on grounds of Exceptional Circumstances.  The appeal was upheld. Student returned to University in September 2022 having progressed to year 3, without having to repeat year 2. First published in Google My Business Reviews

 

 

'Dr Cooper gave incredible advice on my appeal and her knowledge and understanding of how the system works is top notch. My appeal was upheld which I am deeply grateful for. Thank you so much Rosanna. Would 1000% recommend. This is an edit as this is the second time I have used Rosanna's service, she was just as professional as the first time around if not more, the appeal seemed like too much of an ask but she managed to pull it off again and I could not be more grateful. Her expertise is unmatched.' Jupe

 

More

---

Testimonial - Appeal upheld - medical student  - July 2022

 

 Father of medical student studying on the MBChB Medicine programme failed the OSCE resit and was withdrawn from the MBChB programme - RT Coopers were instructed to draft the appeal against the decision to withdrawn the medical student – the appeal was drafted on grounds of procedural irregularity and mitigating circumstances – the medical student did not submit a mitigating circumstances form and declared fir to sit OSCE resit – the appeal was upheld – medical student returning to medical school in September 2022. First published in Google my Business Reviews.

 

 

 

‘The best decision we ever made... If you are looking at this Solicitors because you have failed your medical examinations and been excluded from University you are lucky enough to have found the right place to help you. Sadly this is what happened to my son, and if maybe like ourselves you have read the Uni. appeals process and started filling in the forms, let me stop you there. The truth is the appeals process is not run by your medical school and your Tutors, its run by the University staff and their Solicitors. Things that you believe are valid become irrelevant to them, but things that you believe are inconsequential can win your appeal. I cannot say if you will be successful, but I can tell you that the appeal my son put together and the appeal Rosanna Cooper put together for us after the off chance of contacting them, was like night and day, and after reading Rosanna's appeal it was obvious my son would not of succeeded and be restarting his medical course this September. If you are going up against the Universities Solicitors you need a Solicitor in your corner as they know things about the appeal/procedure you can't begin to think of. You only get 1 chance at the appeal so make sure you throw everything you can at it and RT Coopers is the best weapon you will have’. Stephen Norman

More

 

---

Testimonial - PhD - June 2022

 

PhD student researching the influence of early life factors on missing data in epidemiology using statistical analyses. Crucial aspects of research were carried out by the student without a supervisor or an expert in statistics, computer science or missing data and imputation. Following the viva, student was asked to make major corrections to be awarded PhD. After making corrections and resubmission, the joint examiners report had extensive corrections that the joint examiners wanted the student to make to be even awarded an MPhil. Seemed like a lost case because of academic judgment.  RT Coopers instructed to draft appeal against the decision to award an MPhil. The case required knowledge of statistics and an understanding of missing data and epidemiology. Working closely with the student, RT Coopers drafted a robust appeal for submission. The appeal was upheld. First published in Google My Business Review (no link)

 

 

'I wish to start by saying a big thank you to RT coopers solicitors for their effort and hard work in ensuring that my academic appeal was successful. My case was very complex, meaning that it will be difficult to even get the MPhil which the examiners recommended. I was recommended for an MPhil by the examiners after the second viva, it was devastating, I was physically and psychologically impacted by the outcome of the viva with the belief that I have wasted meaningful years of my life pursuing a project (PhD) that at the end came to nothing. I was highly traumatised, dejected and felt that all I have worked for had been taken away from me. At this point, I decided to take up the option to appeal against the decision of the examiners.

The complex issue was that the examiners’ could not understand what my PhD was all about and the direction I was taking with my PhD studies. They recommended MPhil subject to satisfactory corrections. Looking at the correction list for the MPhil, it was very clear that the examiners did not even want to recommend me for an award of the MPhil. I started searching the internet for academic appeal lawyers. I came across RT coopers and read the reviews and decided to give them a call. I got Rosanna on the phone and in the course of the discussion, she asked me about my PhD. We had a meeting over skype to discuss in detail the PhD and the appeal process. She prepared Grounds of Appeal. The appeal was very detailed, it covered every aspect of my PhD. Irregularities were highlighted which led to the failure of my PhD. The examiners recommended MPhil subject to making recommended corrections to their satisfaction. To put in simple terms, they did not want me to get an MPhil. She was able to establish why their decision not to award me a PhD should not stand. What I have highlighted above is the summary, the appeal document was detailed and persuasive at the end, the appeal was upheld. I commend the effort of and work put in by RT coopers, I will highly recommend their services to any one looking for academic appeal lawyers'. Rose

 

More

 

---

Testimonial - Academic Misconduct - June 2022

 

 

Parent of  final year student studying BSc Mathematics (Hons) accused of academic misconduct (collusion) by the Faculty of the University - RT Coopers painstakingly analysed the evidence adduced by the Faculty, held a consultation with the student and drafted a detailed Statement in defence of the allegation made by the Faculty - The Statement was submitted by the student - there was no hearing - the allegation was dismissed by the Faculty without going any further than the investigation stage - Excellent outcome for such a complicated case. First Published in Google My Business Reviews

 

 

'Rosanna helped our family when my daughter was suspected of academic misconduct. Rosanna is a unique individual and I am honoured to have made her acqaintance.
For me, Rosanna is not only an impeccable lawyer, but an extraordinary person, a role model for other people, examplifying such qualities as dedication, professionalism and a real sense of having a personal mission to help people.'  Victoria Ten

 

More

 

---

Testimonial - Poor Referencing - June 2022

 

 

 Student accused of poor referencing -  Failed Module as a result  and asked to repeat year - RT Coopers drafted appeal - Quick turnaround by university - Appeal upheld - First Published in Google My Business Reviews

 

 

 

'Dr Rosanna Cooper was especially helpful in my case. I don’t think I could have appealed without her expertise. Throughout the process she was extremely informative and made sure I knew exactly what was happening. She was able to pick out features of my case that previous lawyers did not. Dr Cooper looked at my case thoroughly, with empathy for my situation. I would definitely recommend her! Update: I’ve received the outcome for my appeal and it has been upheld! This would not have been possible without the support and expertise of Doctor Cooper. As mentioned earlier, I would definitely recommend her work!' JM

 

 

---

 Testimonial - Accused of Academic Misconduct - June 2022

 

 

 Final year mathematics student who was accused of academic misconduct by University - RT Coopers drafted Statement for hearing 

 

 

'RT Cooper is a firm characterized by excellence and care for their clients and I would recommend it to anyone! I cannot convey how grateful I am to Dr. Rosanna Cooper, whose kindness, generosity and professionalism regarding my case allowed me to see my situation through. The time and work that Rosanna invested in my case made me see me that she truly cares about securing the best outcome for me. I am a final year mathematics student who was accused of academic misconduct by my University.

I know that it is Rosanna’s knowledge, her combination of legal and scientific professional insight, that gave my defense statement a chance to be strong. Rosanna drafted an excellent defense statement despite the tight deadline and the complexity of my case, which required unpicking content of university-level mathematics and programming. Rosanna really understood the details surrounding my case and how each of these complexities needed to be addressed. The statement that she completed was thorough on all fronts, and her communication was prompt throughout. Her composure and clear instructions on what exactly needed to be done to maximally strengthen my statement allowed me to focus on specific tasks, instead of panicking. I am very grateful for your help!' Mallysa Oceon

 

More

 

 

---

 Testimonial: Disciplinary - Medical Student - May 2022

 

 

  Third year medical student - Student drinking heavily during night out - No recollection of behaviour on the night - Student accused of breaches of university regulations as a result of the following acts against female students: threatening, intimidating, disorderly conduct, causing nuisance and harassment. Student also accused of breaches of the fitness to practise regulations as the student’s professionalism and suitability were called into question - There was a substantial risk of exclusion from medical school due to the gravity of the allegations and the overwhelming evidence against the student. RT Coopers advised student and assisted in drafting a statement for submission to the Disciplinary Committee - Student attended Disciplinary Committee hearing - The outcome was accepted by the student who was suspended from university for a period and at the end of suspension will complete final year of medical school.  First published in Google My Business Reviews

 

 

'RTC is an excellent, professional team who validate and resolve difficult emotions and strategise to the nth degree to get the favourable outcome. I can't thank the team enough. I am so grateful for the rapport I have attained with the multidisciplinary team. I will be sure to pursue range of endeavours with them in future. Thank you RTC team. Thank you Rosanna'. MC

 

More

 

---

Testimonial: Trainee Doctor - ARCP

 

 FY2 received ARCP outcome 4 - RT Coopers gave advice on investigating mitigating circumstances - Advice followed and ARCP Outcome 4 overturned on appeal.  First Published on Google My Business Reviews

 

'Thanks for Dr. Rosana Cooper's kindly advice, my son got revised ARCP outcome after appeal review, he is now back to his career path. Much appreciates Dr. Rosana Cooper's time and guidance during our difficult time even she was busy and not be able to take the case that time'. Benzamin Zhang

 

More

 

---

 Testimonial: Self Plagiarism - May 2022

 

 Student studying MSc Biopharmaceuticals accused of self-plagiarism. Following the investigation meeting, student given the option to accept the allegation and be awarded zero for the module and a capped mark of 50 percent on resubmission.  Student denied the allegation as believed there was no plagiarism. RT Coopers instructed to advise and assist student as well as to draft a statement in defence. Consultation held with student and then statement was drafted by the firm.  The analysis of the evidence adduced by the university showed that there was no plagiarism. One of the defences of the allegation was procedural irregularity. The student had to attend a committee hearing. The committee held that there was no self plagiarism. The allegation was dismissed. First published in Google M Business Reviews

 

‘I enquired with several firms about a case of self plagiarism. RT Coopers Solicitors was quick to respond and straight away we were able to go through the specifics of my case. Rosanna spent several hours on Zoom with me going through my entire literature review and we complied evidence that I could use in my appeal. Rosanna also prepared a strong statement that I could use in my case. Whilst waiting for my appeal date Rosanna was on hand to answer any questions and always replied promptly. After appealing, I won the case and am set to graduate with a Distinction. This was a huge relief to me as if the original decision had not been overturned I would’ve graduated with a Merit. I can’t thank RT Coopers enough - they helped me tremendously compiling the evidence and statement I needed to win my case. Highly recommend!’ Jenny

More

 

---

 Testimonial: Mitigating Circumstances - May 2022

 

 Final year biotech student applied for Mitigating Circumstances for a module following a neurodivergent diagnosis. The Mitigating Circumstances application was rejected (decision). This decision meant that the student was likely to be awarded a 2:1 instead of a first class honours degree.  RT Coopers drafted an appeal against the decision and prepared fresh Mitigating Circumstances for all past and remaining modules in the final year. The grounds of appeal were Mitigating Circumstances and procedural irregularity. The appeal was upheld. The Mitigating Circumstances application was accepted. Student on track for a first class degree on graduation. First Published in Google My Business Reviews

 

 

'RT Coopers are an excellent professional law firm and I was pleased with the help that I received. Dr. Cooper advised me, and not only is she a brilliant lawyer, but she is also very caring and supportive of all of her clients. My appeal drafted by RT Coopers for extenuating circumstances was upheld and I am most grateful for the help of Rosanna and the academic lawyers. I strongly recommend this quality firm'. Dani C

 

---

 Final year student studying BSc Economics accused of minor academic misconduct (collusion) in relation to examination in January 2022. Student at risk of getting a 2:2 for award of degree for final classification. Allegation was refuted as there was no evidence to support the allegation brought by the university.  RT Coopers held consultation with student and particularised the grounds of appeal. RT Coopers drafted statement. Student appeal upheld and passed module with a 2:1. Student will graduate with a 2:1 for Economics degree. First published in Google My Business Reviews

 

'I cannot recommend Rosanna and her team highly enough. I approached Coopers regarding an allegation of academic misconduct. My son was devastated when he received this allegation. My son has worked so hard at University and to think this could get taken away so unfairly. When you read the reviews of many people here they state Rosana really cares and I cannot reiterate this enough. Thank you so much for your help'.  Lou L

 

More

 

---

Testimonial - Negotiated Settlement - March 2022

 

 Negotiated package for client - Settlement Agreement  - first published in Google My Business Reviews

 

'I felt compelled to write this review as RT Coopers have been exceptional in the way they have dealt with my case. I had a very bad experience at work and went to a settlement agreement lawyer for help. I spoke to the lawyer who was amazing , she reassured me, supported me and got me an amazing outcome from a very bad situation. I wasn’t in a good place mentally when I first spoke to the firm and was doubting myself but with the amazing reassurance and positivity I received I began to feel much more positive and have a brighter outlook. I would not hesitate to recommend this firm to anybody who is need of help!! THANK YOU'. A Gill

 

More

 

---

Article: Herbal Medicinal Products: Traditional Herbal Registration, March 2022

In this article, Dr Rosanna Cooper explores traditional herbal medicines and traditional herbal registrations. 

• Definition of a Herbal Medicinal Product

A product is defined as an Herbal Medicinal Product under Regulation 8 of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 ((SI 2012/1916 as amended); further amended by The Human Medicines (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020); if the active ingredients are herbal substances and/or herbal preparations only

 

More

---

Testimonial: Update  Withdrawal from University Appeal Upheld - February 2022

 

 

 Mother of first year student on BSc Operating Department Practice failed three consecutive assignments because of mitigating circumstances.  All three assignments were passed on resubmission. Referred in a presentation for a separate module. As there were three consecutive failures of the assignments, the registration for the ODP Programme was terminated. RT Coopers was instructed to draft the appeal against the decision of the university to terminate the registration from the ODP Programme on the grounds of mitigating circumstances and procedural irregularity. First published in Google my Business Reviews.

 

UPDATE 'The appeal was upheld within the shortest possible time. The decision to withdraw my child has been rescinded and I am glad to say he can resume his studies with even more support. Thank you , Rosanna and your team. Would recommend your services any day.

 

Rosanna from RT Coopers was and is still a Godsent. My child was withdrawn from his course after the first year in university and it broke our hearts. The first call I made to Rosanna proved to me that she was extremely professional. She talked us through every stage of the appeal, suggested that we might find medical experts to diagnose the root cause of my child’s problems. In fact we couldn’t have known many learning difficulties at stake without Rosanna’s help. I can’t think of anyone who could have taken on our case and dealt with it the way she did. She spent hours and hours with us on the phone, Skype and in emails just to give us the best possible outcome. 5 stars is not enough to describe her professionalism, dedication and great sense of humour. My family and I are eternally grateful and consider her as a lifelong friend. Thanks Rosanna! You have no idea how brilliant you are'. Mrs A

 

More

 

---

Testimonial: Fitness to Practise - Appeal Upheld - February 2022

 

 

   Final Year Student – False accusations made by University – Referred to Fitness to Practise – Withdrawn from studies as held unfit to practise – RT Coopers instructed after withdrawal and painstakingly worked with student to build a strong appeal – Dr Rosanna Cooper represented student at panel hearing – Appeal upheld. First published in Google my Business Review.

 

 

Dr Cooper has been the best!
I was wrongly accused by my university and was referred to a fitness to practice procedure. I was bullied and treated with bias and prejudice because I was already a medical doctor and had an accent. She fought my case and won it! She is very meticulous and hard working and has fought my case as if she was directly the victim of the injustice.
I’m glad I had her on my side, I don’t think I would have won with anyone else. KS

 

More

---

Practice Area: Genomic Medicines - February 2022

 

Our genomic medicine team is at the cutting edge of the legal and regulatory issues facing companies delivering genomic medicine services in the UK. Our genomic medicine lawyers will advise on genomic testing in particular whole genome sequencing, biomedical research, genetic mutation pathways and variations, epigenetics and the use of genomic data. RT Coopers has assembled a multidisciplinary team comprising life sciences and pharmaceutical lawyers and industry experts who are well placed to advise and assist with legal and regulatory issues in relation to genomic medicines.

More

 

---

Legal Updates:Biocidal active substance renewal - February 2022

There are specific deadlines for submitting your application to the HSE for GB active substance renewal. 

 

• Are your active substance approval about to expire?

 

Under the GB BPR, you have to submit  an application for renewal of active substance/product type combinations at least 550 days before the expiry date In order for your biocidal products to remain on the GB market. The renewal application has to be made by applying for active substance by specific deadlines.

More

---

 

---